patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:

| >
| > | Or put another way, If someone with RTH's history of regression fixing
| > | patches, GCC design and code improvements can't come up with a failing
| > | test case, isn't that an incredibly strong argument that the patch is
| > | sound?
| >
| > No. Not necessarily.  RTH didn't say it can't come up with a testcase
| 				       ^^
| 
| I knew it was a bot!

I'm sorry :-(

I hope RTH didn't take offense.

-- Gaby