[RFA/RFT] libffi reorg (take 2)
Andreas Tobler
toa@pop.agri.ch
Fri Sep 19 14:38:00 GMT 2003
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>Fine, works here with some modifications.
>
>
> Please send.
You'll get them if they are ready.
For the moment I still try to understand.
>>Why do you exchange the size tests with the *_MAX checks?
>
>
> Because unlike size tests, using macros in limits.h does not pollute the
> namespace. Including fficonfig.h is bad, especially with my autoupdated
> version of libffi which puts some defines in it which are *not*
> package-independent (such as PACKAGE and VERSION).
I see, unfotunately LONG_LONG_MAX is a bit a mess here. Have to find out
how it goes.
Andreas
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list