[v3] libstdc++/12239

Benjamin Kosnik bkoz@redhat.com
Wed Sep 17 20:29:00 GMT 2003


>Seems reasonable to me.  

Great. This is in.

>I'm surprised that neither config.sub nor config.gcc complain about
>this already.

... perhaps they don't have to deal with the minutiae of ctype.h? 

-benjamin




More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list