[cs] Robustify in the presence of PCH n snarf-n-barf

[Mike Stump]

On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 03:54 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> The C++ runtime system has the exact same code as your PCH code, but, 
> it does all the required runtime conversions, unlike your code.  
> Please explain why your code isn't just plain wrong.

Grrr.  I'm sorry.  That's uncalled for.  Please read my message as if I 
hadn't included the last line.

The question is, do people think that migrating to _slightly_ stronger 
typing, when it is 100% appropriate and easy is worth-while, and if so, 
then how do we make this and PCH co-exist?