[tree-ssa] PATCH to gimplify_asm_expr for optimization/12525

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Wed Oct 8 00:06:00 GMT 2003


On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:59:25PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I intended to fix this for memory operands by calling mark_addressable so
> they don't get renamed, but the must-alias pass decides that we don't really
> need the address after all.  Diego, any thoughts on how to prevent that?

I'd say have find_addressable_vars apply the same logic, so that
addresses_needed is set for the appropriate variables.  Of course,
I have no idea what addresses_taken is used for, so I don't know
if we're missing out on not having an entry for that...



r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list