PATCH: RFA Fix C/13014

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Sat Nov 22 01:50:00 GMT 2003


On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 17:38, Eric Christopher wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 17:32, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 04:05, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Bootstrapped on x86-linux, regtested on the same. Joseph: I think your
> > > > testcase would be a good addition to the testsuite. Would you care to
> > > > check it in?
> > > 
> > > I've applied the following patch.  Note that the first test is the one for 
> > > the regression from 3.3, and currently FAILs; 
> > 
> > New tests that failed should be XFAILed.
> > 
> > We have Bugzilla for bugs and the testsuite for regression tests.
> 
> Well, I had a patch in review at the time :) Still in review actually...

Yes, well, the test should still be XFAILed.

It should be XFAILed until your patch is checked in; otherwise, it looks
like a potential problem to every other developer.

-- 
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list