[tree-ssa PATCH] Pick memory consumption low hanging fruit

[law@redhat.com]

In message <1069450788.5285.24.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo w
rites:
 >On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 02:21, law@redhat.com wrote:
 >> In message <200311200922.02374.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>, Steven Bossc
 >her 
 >> writes:
 >>  >                  -O2 -fno-tree-pre         idem. + -fno-tree-dominator-o
 >pts
 >>  >Total Allocated   862045732 (+12% ?!)       718380296
 >> Could very easily be the additional varrays.  I've got a patch which
 >> cuts them down significantly.  Unfortunately, that change has exposed
 >> a latent bug.  The bug is in a hunk of code I'm not particularly familiar
 >> with, so I've passed it to Diego.
 >>
 >This ought to fix the bug you found.  Got a test case we can add to the
 >testsuite?
You could turn the testcode I sent you into a testcase.  However, the
domwalker/varray changes I've got queued up will exercise this during
a bootstrap in a couple different places.  So you could claim it's
not strictly necessary.


Jeff