[tree-ssa] Make tail-call work on SSA form

[Richard Henderson]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:41:34PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I've modified expander to always produce addressof in this case and testing
> the patch right now.
> I think in short term this is good fix and in mid term, we will get
> scalar replacement.  THe idea of packing structures/arrays into
> registers is strange anyway.

No, addressof is not a solution.  Indeed, I want it to go away entirely.
Let's leave this alone.  SRA is almost done.


r~