Fix f/intdoc.texi warning

Andreas Jaeger aj@suse.de
Wed Nov 12 09:15:00 GMT 2003


Building gcc I get these warnings:
/cvs/gcc/gcc/f/intdoc.texi:9503: warning: unlikely character ( in @var.
/cvs/gcc/gcc/f/intdoc.texi:9503: warning: unlikely character ) in @var.
/cvs/gcc/gcc/f/intdoc.texi:9582: warning: unlikely character ( in @var.
/cvs/gcc/gcc/f/intdoc.texi:9582: warning: unlikely character ) in @var.

According to the texinfo manual, we really should use @code.  Tested
with running makeinfo.

Ok to commit?

Andreas

2003-11-12  Andreas Jaeger  <aj@suse.de>

	* intdoc.texi (Signal Intrinsic (subroutine)): Fix texinfo warning
	using @code.

============================================================
Index: gcc/f/intdoc.texi
--- gcc/f/intdoc.texi	18 May 2003 14:20:23 -0000	1.26
+++ gcc/f/intdoc.texi	12 Nov 2003 09:08:02 -0000
@@ -9500,7 +9500,7 @@ See @code{signal(2)}.
 
 Note that @var{Handler} will be called using C conventions,
 so the value of its argument in Fortran terms
-Fortran terms is obtained by applying @code{%LOC()} (or @var{LOC()}) to it.
+Fortran terms is obtained by applying @code{%LOC()} (or @code{LOC()}) to it.
 
 The value returned by @code{signal(2)} is written to @var{Status}, if
 that argument is supplied.
@@ -9579,7 +9579,7 @@ See @code{signal(2)}.
 
 Note that @var{Handler} will be called using C conventions,
 so the value of its argument in Fortran terms
-is obtained by applying @code{%LOC()} (or @var{LOC()}) to it.
+is obtained by applying @code{%LOC()} (or @code{LOC()}) to it.
 
 The value returned by @code{signal(2)} is returned.
 

-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20031112/22a6024d/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list