[patch?] num_sign_bit_copies1: sign_extending consts
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Mon Nov 3 23:07:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:02:30PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> It's been doing it for a while. Who should be not doing that? Is
> this a known bug, or am I the first to spot it?
Whoever substitutes a constant into a subreg or an extend
should simplify it. Several of these have been fixed;
apparently there's another that needs doing.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list