[PATCH] Document Sparc64 configuration

[Rainer Orth]

Richard Henderson writes:

> > 	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-03/msg01762.html
> 
> I don't see *any* response from you on that thread.

Oops, sorry, wrong link:

	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg01914.html

Besides, given that all of config.sub, gcc, gdb and ld still allow for the
sparcv9 form, it would create even more confusion to obsolete that name in
gcc only.  If we really wanted to do this (which I still consider
inappropriate for Solaris 2), this should be done consistently all over the
place.

	Rainer