[tree-ssa] Misc C++ improvements

[Diego Novillo]

On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 17:55, law@redhat.com wrote:

> 20020412-1.c certainly doesn't need to be looking at the TYPE_DECLs,
> nor does any other test that I can find.
> 
Cool.  Maybe it really isn't necessary.  It should be easy to check by
just putting an abort() if the condition triggers.

> Are you sure you weren't working around a bug elsewhere, particularly in
> the life analysis code that went in at just about the same time?
> 
Sorry, all I remember is adding code to the VLA finder until it stopped
failing.

> If you recall we were failing to consider the uses that occurred in
> VDEFs when computing what variables were live across block boundaries.
> That caused us to mis-compile some tests, including 20020412-1.c if
> I recall correctly.
> 
Well, the VLA finder only looks at declarations, so I'm not sure why
they would be related.  But if removing the check doesn't break
anything, then great!


Diego.