[PATCH] Define _LP64 on x86-64?

[Andreas Jaeger]

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:23:30PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> writes:
>> > And what about ILP32 and supposedly ILP64?
>> 
>> So far there's no define for it - but we can easily add one.  If
>> there's a need, send a patch but I haven't seen any need yet.
>
> The point being that your docs are wrong.  You won't define
> LP64 for ILP64, like on alpha-cray-unicosmk.
>
> The patch is ok with the docs fixed.

Also for 3.3?

Thanks for the review,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj