[PATCH] Location_tize define_label
Nathan Sidwell
nathan@codesourcery.com
Sat Jun 28 13:21:00 GMT 2003
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> | --- 2053,2061 ----
> | Otherwise return 0. */
> |
> | tree
> | ! define_label (location_t location, tree name)
>
> Isn't more efficient to pass a pointer to location instead of copying
> and passing around the structure? I.e., I would see
>
> tree
> define_label (const location_t *locaotion, tree name)
That would make the envtentual line map switchover difficult. And thereby
defeat the whole point of these patches.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list