Better varpool patch

[Jan Hubicka]

> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:43:02PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > You mean by that that the functions should go into cgraph.c instead
> > of having their own file?
> 
> Yes.
OK, I will prepare updated patch soon.
> 
> > I had this done so originally but then I started to fell uneasy to
> > have something that manages variables in something that is called
> > callgraph, but I would not mind to return it back :)
> 
> Eh, it's still callgraph related, more or less.
OK, it is :)
What about the names?  Should I preserve varpool_node
or have something like cgraph_variable_node or cgraph_varpool_node?

Honza
> 
> 
> r~