Start moving toplev options to opts.c
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Mon Jun 16 21:01:00 GMT 2003
On Jun 16, 2003, Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> wrote:
> I can't believe you're complaining about something that is a build-time
> not run-time issue, or that you think handling 65537 macro parameters
> is more important than a CPP that uses memory and CPU efficiently.
Sorry. Because of the ongoing discussion about command-line option
handling, I had read `macro parameters' as `command-line parameters
defining macros' (e.g. -Dfoo=bar), not as parameters to a macro
(#define foo(parameters)). Oops. The latter is certainly far less
relevant than the former. Apologies for the confusion.
Still, we do have a conflict with the coding standards. We can
probably agree this conflict is irrelevant, though.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list