Minor cleanup in gencheck.c

[Andreas Jaeger]

kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:

> Because it includes tree nodes from all languages, it can write duplicate
> macro definitions.  Since they are identical, it isn't an error, but isn't
> a particularly good idea either.  This checks.

Sounds fine - but did you bootstrap and regression test this patch
anywhere?  Please state this in your messages,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, SuSE Linux AG, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20030615/31d3c927/attachment.sig>