RFC: target-hook-ize ASM_FILE_START
Kazu Hirata
kazu@cs.umass.edu
Sun Jun 15 07:21:00 GMT 2003
Hi Zack,
> This is decidedly nontrivial and I'd appreciate port maintainers
> checking over their chunk of it. Problems are especially likely in
> the ARM, PA, and RS/6000 back ends. There are definitely behavior
> changes in here; I *think* all of them amount to bugfixes. Please
> note I have not tested this at all. I expect modifications will be
> necessary, so I'm not going to bother writing a change log for this
> edition.
With this patch, I found no new regressions on h8300 port. In fact,
the following regressions went away. :-)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c spurious clobbered warning (test for bogus messages, line 16)
FAIL: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c (test for excess errors)
Kazu Hirata
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list