C++ PATCH: PR 11493 and PR 11495

Wolfgang Bangerth bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
Fri Jul 18 15:31:00 GMT 2003


On Friday 18 July 2003 10:20 am, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > ! The error can be removed by making the code valid: either write the
> > call
>
> I'd say "making the function name dependent".

I had meant to make it clear that the code is invalid as-is and that we are 
not trying to _work around_ an error. Do you have a compromise wording?

W.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list