C++ PATCH: PR 11493 and PR 11495
Wolfgang Bangerth
bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
Fri Jul 18 15:31:00 GMT 2003
On Friday 18 July 2003 10:20 am, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > ! The error can be removed by making the code valid: either write the
> > call
>
> I'd say "making the function name dependent".
I had meant to make it clear that the code is invalid as-is and that we are
not trying to _work around_ an error. Do you have a compromise wording?
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list