binutils + gcc 3.3

[Dara Hazeghi]

--- Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > 
> > does the following patch look reasonable then?
> 
> I agree with Andrew that you should say "required"
> in both cases.  

Not certain what is meant by "both" here.

Is this more clear?

! As of GCC 3.3, binutils 2.13.1 or later is required
for this platform.
! See @uref{http://gcc.gnu.org/PR10877,,bug 10877} for
more information.

Thanks,

Dara

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: docbinutils.patch
Type: application/x-unknown
Size: 954 bytes
Desc: docbinutils.patch
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20030702/01d1fdd3/attachment.bin>