[tree-ssa] Fix gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c [patch]

[law@redhat.com]

In message <20030131170409.GA24661@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo w
rites:
 >On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jeff Law wrote:
 >
 >> Which makes me wonder if this is why the compiler was able to
 >> compile insn-attrtab.c faster after the coalescing patch.  If we
 >> were incorrectly wiping out code, then, well there'd be less for
 >> the backend optimizers (particularly gcse) to do...
 >> 
 >Hmm, interesting thought... but if we were incorrectly wiping
 >code in insn-attrtab.c, I doubt we would be able to bootstrap :)
Maybe, maybe not -- depends on what code got zapped.  If it was just
latency information or something like that, then we'd still bootstrap.


 >In any case, I found no differences in the time report.  What is
 >interesting is that we spend 90-95% of the total system time in
 >GCSE.  That's a lot of system time.
Probably due to memory consumption causing page faults and such.

Jeff