[patch] i386: Fix comment typos.

[Kazu Hirata]

Hi,

Attached is a patch to fix comment typos.  Committed as obvious.

Kazu Hirata

2003-01-26  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>

	* config/i386/i386-modes.def: Fix comment typos.
	* config/i386/i386.c: Likewise.
	* config/i386/i386.md: Likewise.

Index: i386-modes.def
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386-modes.def,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 i386-modes.def
--- i386-modes.def	10 Jun 2002 22:35:46 -0000	1.1
+++ i386-modes.def	26 Jan 2003 19:55:20 -0000
@@ -27,11 +27,11 @@
    Overflow flag to be unset.  Sign bit test is used instead and
    thus can be used to form "a&b>0" type of tests.
 
-   Add CCGC to indicate comparisons agains zero that allows
+   Add CCGC to indicate comparisons against zero that allows
    unspecified garbage in the Carry flag.  This mode is used
    by inc/dec instructions.
 
-   Add CCGOC to indicate comparisons agains zero that allows
+   Add CCGOC to indicate comparisons against zero that allows
    unspecified garbage in the Carry and Overflow flag. This
    mode is used to simulate comparisons of (a-b) and (a+b)
    against zero using sub/cmp/add operations.
Index: i386.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c,v
retrieving revision 1.515
diff -u -r1.515 i386.c
--- i386.c	25 Jan 2003 22:40:32 -0000	1.515
+++ i386.c	26 Jan 2003 19:55:26 -0000
@@ -8465,7 +8465,7 @@
 	return CCGCmode;
       /* Codes doable only with sign flag when comparing
          against zero, but we miss jump instruction for it
-         so we need to use relational tests agains overflow
+         so we need to use relational tests against overflow
          that thus needs to be zero.  */
     case GT:			/* ZF=0 & SF=OF */
     case LE:			/* ZF=1 | SF<>OF */
@@ -10765,7 +10765,7 @@
          handle small counts using the loops.  Many CPUs (such as Athlon)
          have large REP prefix setup costs.
 
-         This is quite costy.  Maybe we can revisit this decision later or
+         This is quite costly.  Maybe we can revisit this decision later or
          add some customizability to this code.  */
 
       if (count == 0 && align < desired_alignment)
Index: i386.md
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.md,v
retrieving revision 1.414
diff -u -r1.414 i386.md
--- i386.md	25 Jan 2003 15:00:51 -0000	1.414
+++ i386.md	26 Jan 2003 19:55:31 -0000
@@ -5867,7 +5867,7 @@
 	(const_string "alu")))
    (set_attr "mode" "SI")])
 
-; For comparisons agains 1, -1 and 128, we may generate better code
+; For comparisons against 1, -1 and 128, we may generate better code
 ; by converting cmp to add, inc or dec as done by peephole2.  This pattern
 ; is matched then.  We can't accept general immediate, because for
 ; case of overflows,  the result is messed up.