e: PATCH doc/install.texi (hppa*-hp-hpux11) PHSS_26559 Linker patch

Rodney Brown rdbrown@mira.net
Sat Jan 25 06:45:00 GMT 2003


 >>         * doc/install.texi (hppa*-hp-hpux11): Mention linker patch.

 >> --- doc/install.texi.orig       2003-01-22 09:37:55.000000000 +1100
 >> +++ doc/install.texi    2003-01-25 12:56:43.000000000 +1100
 >> @@ -2232,6 +2232,8 @@ compiler as the bundled compiler only su
 >>  Bootstrapping with the bundled compiler is tested infrequently and
 >>  problems often arise because of the subtle differences in semantics
 >>  between traditional and ISO C.
 >> +The HP-UX 11.00 linker patch @code{PHSS_26559} fixes linker core dumps
 >> +creating C++ shared libraries.

 >I have PHSS_24304 on the 11.11 system that I have.  I haven't had any
 >ld segmentation faults using it.  I will revise your patch to mention
 >a patch level for it as well.  What patch were you using before?

 >I am hoping that HP might backport some of these fixes to 10.X but I
 >am not holding my breath.

Here's the swlist stuff and what info.

  XSWGR1100     B.11.00.53.2   HP-UX General Release Patches, June 2001

  PHSS_17825    1.0            ld(1) and linker tools cumulative patch

-r-xr-xr-x   1 bin        bin         593920 Feb  1  2001 /usr/ccs/bin/ld

bash-2.05b$ what /usr/ccs/bin/ld
/usr/ccs/bin/ld:
        HP aC++ B3910B A.03.27 Classic Iostream Library
        HP aC++ B3910B A.03.27 Language Support Library
        ld_msgs.cat: $Revision: 1.85 $
        92453-07 linker command s800.sgs ld PA64 B.11.25 REL 001129
bash-2.05b$ sum -r /usr/ccs/bin/ld
04190  1160 /usr/ccs/bin/ld

This is the same box that is giving the

/usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol: pthread_once (code)  from 
/usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.sl
FAIL: g++.dg/bprob/g++-bprob-1.C execution,    -g  -fprofile-arcs

fails on all C++ & libstdc++ execution tests. I still haven't sorted 
that out - I'd
half hoped the ld patch would wipe it out. Since the box is for gcc 
testing let me
know what you'd like on it. It's running hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00 - the 
64-bit OS
would let me bootstrap both 32 & 64 bit.






More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list