patch: Darwin/x86 fails to build
Stuart Hastings
stuart@apple.com
Fri Jan 10 19:16:00 GMT 2003
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 15:05 US/Pacific, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 10:43:16AM -0800, Stuart Hastings wrote:
>> + if (ix86_regparm > 2)
>> + abort ();
>
> Why this bit?
You're right; it can go. It got inherited by an accumulation of merges
between the FSF and Apple versions. It's originally from the previous
FSF version of this function, pre-October-2002, and it appears to be
useless today. I'd assumed it was required for the NeXT Objective-C
runtime; it's not.
How much testing would you require to resubmit the same patch without
those two lines?
stuart hastings
Apple Computer
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list