[PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
Chris Lattner
sabre@nondot.org
Fri Feb 14 04:48:00 GMT 2003
> > really very little cost. The only major cases I can think of that the
> > initialization would not be killed would be something like this:
>
> Hmm, I am quite dubious about the claim that this would have zero overhead
> in practice, but if true, then I agree, it should be done.
Please don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming _zero_ overhead, just "very
little" overhead overhead. C programmers everywhere would rebel against
such a thing, but it certainly would be a useful option to have. If your
program doesn't work with optimization turned on, you could try this
switch, and it might help paper over the problem. :)
-Chris
--
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list