[PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics

Chris Lattner sabre@nondot.org
Fri Feb 14 04:48:00 GMT 2003


> > really very little cost.  The only major cases I can think of that the
> > initialization would not be killed would be something like this:
>
> Hmm, I am quite dubious about the claim that this would have zero overhead
> in practice, but if true, then I agree, it should be done.

Please don't get me wrong, I'm not claiming _zero_ overhead, just "very
little" overhead overhead.  C programmers everywhere would rebel against
such a thing, but it certainly would be a useful option to have.  If your
program doesn't work with optimization turned on, you could try this
switch, and it might help paper over the problem.  :)

-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list