[testsuite] XFAIL for dg-debug testsuite

[John David Anglin]

> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 08:59:36AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > We can fix this if we make sure that we have at least one other
> > > instruction.  One way to do that is to modify the testcase so that p is
> > > a global instead of a parameter.  We thus need a load instruction.  The
> > > other optimizations all occur as before, the block is optimized into a
> > > conditional move.  Except this time the testcase works because the load
> > > is left in the body, and we get the debug info for the sparc.
> > >
> > > If this is undesirable for some reason, then the testsuite patch you
> > > proposed is OK.
> > 
> > I think our policy is not to tweak testcases.  That said, if Richard wants to 
> > make an exception (or let me replace them by debug-[78].c), I think this 
> > would be more elegant than once again hacking the testsuite driver.
> 
> The solution sounds ok.  I myself don't care about replace vs modify.

I'm all for fixing/replacing these tests.  At certain optimizations
levels, they also fail on all PA-RISC ports.  I had a hack to the driver
to XFAIL them but was too ashamed to submit it.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)