[tree-ssa] Get rid of LOOP_EXPRs

Andrew MacLeod amacleod@redhat.com
Sat Aug 23 12:59:00 GMT 2003


On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 03:44, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> >  >> Can you put the bsi_next_in_bb change into a separate patch
> >  >
> >  >yes I could; but given that it is just that one line, it would be
> >  >perhaps easier if you just imagined I did it :-)
> > In general, it's best to send unrelated patches as separate messages.  However,
> > since I've already got a test running with just this one patch installed,
> > I'll go ahead and take responsibility to break it out.
> 
> sorry for this; I was in an extremely lazy mood yesterday :-(
> 

Im actually the one being derelict here. I was testing a similar patch
yesterday.  This change should be fine. It looks like a long standing
oversight bug...

So, are we going to do anything with BIND_EXPR's? ie, wasn't there a
thought of removing them, promoting the vars, and replacing them with
debugging over a range info in dwarf2? We are spending a fair amount of
time dealing with them which might be better spent eliminating them if
we plan to get rid of all these container type constructs...

Andrew



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list