Simplify handling of TARGET_4300_MUL_FIX
cgd@broadcom.com
cgd@broadcom.com
Mon Aug 18 17:00:00 GMT 2003
At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:52:32 +0000 (UTC), "Richard Sandiford" wrote:
> cgd@broadcom.com writes:
> > At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:46:42 +0000 (UTC), "Eric Christopher" wrote:
> > > > based on our discussion about trap stuff, do you need the length
> > > > attributes for mul*_4300? 8-)
> > >
> > > Huh?
> >
> > Well, he pointed out to me in another thread that length is
> > automatically calculated based on the number of newlines and/or
> > semicolons in the instruction list.
>
> Actually, when I said "see the default definition of the length attribute",
> I was talking this in mips.md:
yeah, never mind me.
In response to your earlier comemnt, i think I looked (but obviously
not too carefully) in md.texi for length attribute information, and
found the bit about define_asm_attributes, but didn't pick up enough
context.
(On the plus side, the world works more like i originally thought it
did. On the minus side, i look a bit more clueless...)
cgd
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list