Simplify handling of TARGET_4300_MUL_FIX

cgd@broadcom.com cgd@broadcom.com
Mon Aug 18 17:00:00 GMT 2003


At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:52:32 +0000 (UTC), "Richard Sandiford" wrote:
> cgd@broadcom.com writes:
> > At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:46:42 +0000 (UTC), "Eric Christopher" wrote:
> > > > based on our discussion about trap stuff, do you need the length
> > > > attributes for mul*_4300?  8-)
> > > 
> > > Huh?
> > 
> > Well, he pointed out to me in another thread that length is
> > automatically calculated based on the number of newlines and/or
> > semicolons in the instruction list.
> 
> Actually, when I said "see the default definition of the length attribute",
> I was talking this in mips.md:

yeah, never mind me.

In response to your earlier comemnt, i think I looked (but obviously
not too carefully) in md.texi for length attribute information, and
found the bit about define_asm_attributes, but didn't pick up enough
context.


(On the plus side, the world works more like i originally thought it
did.  On the minus side, i look a bit more clueless...)



cgd



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list