[PATCH] Promoted variable SUBREG optimizations
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Tue Aug 12 16:13:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:29:59PM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> Could you explain what goes wrong above?
I just said -- two alternatives don't sign extend the result.
> The comments in rtl.h seem
> to imply that an extended subreg can only be used as a LHS, when the
> required extension gets performed. [But that might not be relevant].
You mean RHS? If that's true, that might be correct. I would like
to see where that LHS DImode is initialized before I believe it.
> I take it that you're happy with the dojump.c
> hunk of the patch...
I didn't read it separately, sorry.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list