[tree-ssa] Improve gimplification/dominator optimizations
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Mon Aug 11 19:00:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:32:29 -0600, law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <wvlbruwqcrm.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>, Jason Merrill writes:
> >FYI, I have a patch in the works to do the same transformation by declaring
> >that decls in memory are not valid values. I'll remove this patch when it
> >goes in.
> I've got a similar patch as well -- I reject them in is_gimple_val, but
> that's not sufficient to catch them all. Specifically those inside
> INDIRECT_REFSs are missed.
Good point, we need a different predicate to handle INDIRECT_REFs.
Jason
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list