[tree-ssa] Fix variables getting out of their scope
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Sun Aug 10 21:46:00 GMT 2003
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 17:32, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> > > DOesn't the gimplifier run without optimization?
> > > If so, and we do this in the GIMPLIFIER, it would occur without
> > > optimization as well.
> > >
> > I never say we'd do this in the gimplifier :)
> >
> Oh.
> In that case, as long as you only do it with optimization, yer golden.
Also, we could track this for user variables.
We just need to say that the old variable has a location equal to the new
local variable generated for it.
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list