[PATCH] Fix PR11784 - atomic __exchange_and_add() broken for ColdFire targets

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Wed Aug 6 18:55:00 GMT 2003


On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> No, absolutely not. ColdFire cores don't provide the immediate
> addressing mode for the BSET instruction (probably because it
> would make the opcode too long for the simplified execution unit).

But immediate addressing is valid for _some_ instructions
on ColdFire?  If so, ok...


r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list