DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Wed Apr 23 04:05:00 GMT 2003
On Apr 22, 2003, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) wrote:
> So the question is when to supress the an optional increase for
> objects and I claim the only time should be if there is an alignment
> specified *for a particular object*.
I suppose we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. I strongly
dislike the idea that factoring out an alignment specification from an
object definition to a typedef, adjusting the object definition to use
the typedef, should have any effect in the way the assembly code
emitted for that object definition.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list