RFC: Remove TREE_CST_RTL

[Mark Mitchell]

On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 12:39, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> writes:
> 
> >
> > Better to put an abort() there then, since there aren't supposed
> > to be any constant-pool items for cris-*-*.
> 
> This is the tree constant pool; it gets used for things like
> STRING_CST nodes and structure initializers.

The key idea here (getting rid of TREE_CST_RTL) is an excellent idea,
and the patch looks like a sensible approach to that problem.

Thanks!

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com