[RFC] C++ vs forced unwinding

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Tue Apr 1 23:44:00 GMT 2003


On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:48:58 -0800, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:35:00PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> I'm dubious about this.  Can't we just say that you can't call a
>> cancellation point from a function declared throw()?
>
> We could.  Does that make more or less sense than being able to
> call a cancellation point from a function declared throw(int)?

Hmm.  It might be reasonable to make the same judgement about a throw(int)
function, but I'm inclined to keep throw() as a special case.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list