[tree-ssa] un-ssa - part 1

[Andrew MacLeod]

On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 09:53, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 09:32, law@redhat.com wrote:
> 
> > Then we go fix them.  This shouldn't be that unexpected for a first
> > implementation.
> >
> Eh, of course we go fix them.  That was precisely why I posted the
> timings.
> 
> > My preference would be to get this code installed and enabled and start
> > beating on its performance.
> > 
> Yes.  Andrew, let's install it but disable it by default as you proposed
> until we figure out how to fix the performance to acceptable levels. 
> It'll be easier than having local patches.
> 
I'm going to take a quick peek this morning at where the times are and
see if there is something so glaringly obvious that fixing it will leave
us in a reasonable state.. There probably is, in which case we'll be
able to enable it by default.

Andrew