[tree-ssa] fix botched renaming
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Thu Sep 19 13:28:00 GMT 2002
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 03:50 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:45:08PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> Yes, but you also claimed i didn't compile the changes, implying i'm
>> not careful about doing so, which i did, and am.
>
> You didn't compile the changes you committed, and that's a fact.
Yes, but not the same fact you claimed in the original message, and
thus, irrelevant.
You said: "Do us the favour of at least _compiling_ your changes."
Which is
1. Rude, for no good reason (which is why i even bothered to reply).
2. Incorrect. I compiled my changes. However, all of them were not
what was committed. There is a difference.
You make it seem like the changes in question were untested, which they
were not.
The changes were not broken, the commit was.
> If you need separate check-outs for separate changes, please do so.
>
Once again, this is also rude, for no good reason.
If you feel the need to berate or belittle me, please do so privately.
I don't need your help in managing my development environment. If
you'd like to watch my typing and make sure i don't spell things wrong
once every two years, feel free.
--Dan
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list