[tree-ssa] Fix memory problems with large jumpy functions [patch]

[Diego Novillo]

On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 08:14, Jason Merrill wrote:

> > Hmmm, this is *exactly* what we have today (see tree-flow.h).  The
> > problem is (a) the aggregated union is rather large (52 bytes on
> > x86-32)
> 
> But you never create an object of that union, do you?
> 
Rats.  We do.

That's what was nagging me.  I remember we talking about it, but I
didn't write it down.  Ergo, it never happened :(


Thanks.  Diego.