Fix x86-64 PIC
Jan Hubicka
jh@suse.cz
Tue Oct 29 12:48:00 GMT 2002
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:41:07PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > Could you please post some testcases of source lousy code?
> > > I'd like to know what valid 32-bit sign extended values my recent x86_64_sign_extended_value
> > > changes don't catch.
> >
> > static int t;
> > q()
> > {
> > t=1;
> > }
> > &t is not sign_extended_value, but t(%rip) is valid and recognized by the
> > pic_operand later.
>
> With -O2 -fpic I get:
> q:
> movl $1, t(%rip)
> ret
> t is a x86_64_sign_extended_value in CM_SMALL_PIC model (since 2002-10-21).
That is wrong.
Honza
>
> Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list