[PATCH] Update COND_EXPR section of c-tree.texi

[Toon Moene]

Roger Sayle wrote:

 >  I suspect that there are more bugs here,
> but I'm cautious to continue looking for an alternate solution to
> PR fortran/7388, until the related fixes are in the tree.  We certainly
> still need to fix "(abort(), 0)" irrespective of the void types in
> COND_EXPR outcome.

Roger, did you actually fix PR fortran/7388 ?  It doesn't fail on my 
powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu anymore and from the archive of 
gcc-testresults I get the impression it doesn't fail on a couple of 
other architectures anymore as well.

However, I can't find anything in the gcc and f ChangeLogs that 
indicates that you did apply a patch for 7388 ...

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)