[basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests

[Mark Mitchell]

--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 05:43:28 PM -0800 Richard Henderson 
<rth@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:26:38PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> Except that it also handles asynchronous exceptions, which ours doesn't.
>
> Heh.  Not that I've tried, but I bet theirs doesn't *really* handle
> asynchronous exceptions any more than ours does.  I bet the best they
> can actually handle properly are synchronous exceptions -- which we
> can also do with -fnon-call-exceptions.
>
> The difference between SIGFPE and SIGALRM is very significant.

You're probably correct.  They handle the SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, etc., kind
of stuff -- probably not SIGALRM.

-- 
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com