[basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests

[Richard Henderson]

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:26:38PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Except that it also handles asynchronous exceptions, which ours doesn't.

Heh.  Not that I've tried, but I bet theirs doesn't *really* handle
asynchronous exceptions any more than ours does.  I bet the best they
can actually handle properly are synchronous exceptions -- which we
can also do with -fnon-call-exceptions.

The difference between SIGFPE and SIGALRM is very significant.


r~