[PATCH] Fix typo in libiberty/configure.in
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Wed May 22 13:58:00 GMT 2002
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
|> > The types "int (*)[]" and "int *" are not compatible,
|>
|> Except that the address of an array points to an int, not to another
|> pointer, so "v" and "&v" are semantically identical. They seem
|> technically compatible to me.
No, they aren't. Think about "&v + 1" vs. "v + 1" (the former is only
valid once the type is completed, of course).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list