[PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> writes:

| Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
| 
| >>Hi. However, why g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins9.C does not fail during 
| >>g++ regression testing? This I cannot understand because, to be honest, 
| >>I don't know in detail how those tests are carried out. Perhaps are 
| >>build not link?!? Roger (and Mark) of course meant to link too, but...
| >>
| >Dunno.
| >
| Now I know why.
| Just look at g++.log: all those g++.old-deja/g++.other tests are built 
| /o/n/l/y -O2
| In order to properly test what was meant to test, it is needed a:

Paolo, thanks for the detective work.

Incidently, Mark, I think we all agreed that new testcases should go
under g++.dg, not g++.old-deja.  g++.dg don't unilateraly set any
optimization level, I think that is a good path (we would have caught
this regression).

-- Gaby