[PATCH] Update a stab string to reflect gcc3

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 03:21:46PM -0800, Jim Ingham wrote:
> Oh, yeah, I forgot about this.  Probably the best course is to emit both 
> the "gcc2_compiled" and the "gcc3_compiled" stabs.  As gdb is currently 
> written, it will pick up the former, and totally ignore the latter.  But 
> then we can change it to read the latter as well, and do whatever we 
> want with it.

Just curious - what did you want this knowledge for?

> On Friday, March 15, 2002, at 03:02  PM, Ira Ruben wrote:
> 
> >At 5:21 PM -0300 3/15/02, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> >>AFAIK at least GDB used to rely on a symbol named explicitly
> >>`gcc2_compiled', not something that actually reflected the exact GCC
> >>major version number.
> >
> >At 5:15 PM -0500 3/15/02, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> >>It still does.  It's not clear how many of the uses are still
> >>necessary, but the code is definitely still there.
> >
> >Well, it was one of the guys working on gdb here that asked for it to 
> >be changed...until I told him about what you said :-)  He went back to 
> >verify it and you are correct.  So if, when, and until he submits any 
> >(accepted) gdb patches that want that string changed consider my patch 
> >withdrawn.
> >
> >Sorry for the "noise" and thanks for pointing this out.
> >
> >Ira
> >
> --
> Jim Ingham                                   jingham@apple.com
> Developer Tools - gdb
> Apple Computer
> 
> 

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer