libjava "make install" is broken again
Bryce McKinlay
bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz
Sun Mar 3 16:58:00 GMT 2002
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>On Mar 2, 2002, Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
>
>>This patch caused "make install" of libjava to silently fail
>>
>
>Silently? I don't recall any silent failures in libjava.
>
By silent I meant that running "make install" did not report any obvious
errors and appeared to complete normally, but libgcj.so.2.0.0 was not
copied to the $prefix/lib directory. Thus an old libgcj was still there,
and I spent a while trying to figure out why a bug I thought I'd fixed
was still occuring ;-)
>Anyway, are you sure you cleaned <target>/config.cache and
>reconfigured libjava after this change went in? If not, you'd see
>install failures because of libtool's not being able to guess the tag
>because it was configured with one CXX and a different one was being
>used for installation.
>
OK, after blowing away my build directory and doing a complete rebuild,
it appears that this was the problem. Sorry.
BTW, do you know how to stop libtool doing a "relink" of libgcj.la on
every "make install"? It does not do this for libstdc++ so it appears to
be something libjava is doing?
regards
Bryce.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list