PATCH: doc/extend.texi nit

Loren James Rittle rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com
Tue Jun 25 17:47:00 GMT 2002


Committed as obvious after noting bootstrap failure.  Checked by
rebuilding from break point on i386-*-freebsd4.6 with makeinfo 4.1.
Documentation changes need to be checked just like any other...

	* doc/extend.texi: Fix formatting of last checkin.

Index: doc/extend.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/doc/extend.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -c -r1.85 extend.texi
*** gcc/doc/extend.texi	25 Jun 2002 21:29:41 -0000	1.85
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi	25 Jun 2002 23:36:40 -0000
***************
*** 5118,5128 ****
  @code{vector bool} type is deprecated and will be discontinued in
  further revisions.  Use @code{vector signed} instead.  If @code{signed}
  or @code{unsigned} is omitted, the vector type will default to
! @{signed}.  Lastly, all overloaded functions are implemented with macros
  for the C implementation.  So code the following example will not work:
  
  @smallexample
!   vec_add ((vector signed int){1, 2, 3, 4}, foo);
  @end smallexample
  
  Since vec_add is a macro, the vector constant in the above example will
--- 5118,5128 ----
  @code{vector bool} type is deprecated and will be discontinued in
  further revisions.  Use @code{vector signed} instead.  If @code{signed}
  or @code{unsigned} is omitted, the vector type will default to
! @code{signed}.  Lastly, all overloaded functions are implemented with macros
  for the C implementation.  So code the following example will not work:
  
  @smallexample
!   vec_add ((vector signed int)@{1, 2, 3, 4@}, foo);
  @end smallexample
  
  Since vec_add is a macro, the vector constant in the above example will



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list