fix for df.c (was: Partial merge from new-regalloc-branch to HEAD)

[Andreas Jaeger]

Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu> writes:

> Am Son, 2002-06-23 um 00.48 schrieb Michael Matz:
>
>> This would have fixed the potential problem.  But I believe the patch I
>> attached last time is better.  At the time of the calls we know exactly
>> how large the table must be (at least).
>
> Please comment it appropriatly then. Many people might be confused by
> the twice occuring block and might try to remove one without seeing what
> happens exactly.

Have a look at Michael's revised patch with Message-Id
<Pine.LNX.4.33.0206221904490.4731-100000@wotan.suse.de>.  It does not
contain the block twice anymore and is a better solution.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj