[ast-optimizer-branch]: Your change to c-pretty-print.c is broken.

Daniel Berlin dberlin@dberlin.org
Mon Jun 17 06:26:00 GMT 2002


On Monday, June 17, 2002, at 06:35  AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:

> Hi -
>
> dberlin wrote:
>
>>> I'm planning to commit the following patch.  It fixes the printing of
>>> expressions [...]
>>> where the 8/7 indices were not both correctly printed because the
>>> size of the pointed-to type was accounted for improperly.
>>
>> However, it broke some printing [completely]. [...]

> Right, Diego came across the problem on Friday.
Yeah, I hit it about an hour after you committed, I was just too lazy to write anything till now.
:)
Long week and all that.

> I'll submit a patch today
> that guards against that division-by-zero.
Okaleedokalee

> I'd have done it earlier, but
> in the process, I ran into an annoying fact about the tree representation
> of pointer-typed INT_CST nodes.  That is that their values cannot be
> unambiguously pretty-printed by looking at the INT_CST value/type
> locally, since ints cast to pointers are altered differently from ints
> added to pointers.  Working around this has been taking a little more time.
>
Yummy.




>
> - FChE
>



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list