ASM_OUTPUT_SECTION_NAME cleanup patch problem
Sat Jun 8 16:47:00 GMT 2002
> Oops, this is coff; I see your point. Well, we could have
> stubs in libgcc.a (as opposed to libgcc_eh.a) that do
> nothing. That would reduce the overhead to perhaps low
> hundereds of bytes.
Which would still be quite a lot for a 4 KB device.
> Or I could just fix what I broke. I guess I'll look at
> that next week.
Note that I put a stopgap fix on the mainline in sh/coff.h,
modeled after the way the h8300-hms port kept working.
Ugly, but it does the job.
(It uses HAS_INIT_SECTION even though there is no such thing,
and counteracts the side-effects with INVOKE___MAIN.)
More information about the Gcc-patches